By Steven Melendez edited by Eric Sullivan
for y,p in zip(ys, pf):
，更多细节参见币安Binance官网
When Will it End?
RemoteProcess proc;
。谷歌对此有专业解读
The tables above shows it all. IOPS wise, Optane is up-to-par with the competition, but the drive shines when it comes down to latency. It’s just astonishing. Being around 25 microsecond (us) per 4K random read for Optane versus 90 to 110 us for NAND based drives. Putting it in perspective, is that every small read on an Optane drive is more than 300% faster. Even up to 1.3 Million IOPS on a single drive.，这一点在今日热点中也有详细论述