During development I encountered a caveat: Opus 4.5 can’t test or view a terminal output, especially one with unusual functional requirements. But despite being blind, it knew enough about the ratatui terminal framework to implement whatever UI changes I asked. There were a large number of UI bugs that likely were caused by Opus’s inability to create test cases, namely failures to account for scroll offsets resulting in incorrect click locations. As someone who spent 5 years as a black box Software QA Engineer who was unable to review the underlying code, this situation was my specialty. I put my QA skills to work by messing around with miditui, told Opus any errors with occasionally a screenshot, and it was able to fix them easily. I do not believe that these bugs are inherently due to LLM agents being better or worse than humans as humans are most definitely capable of making the same mistakes. Even though I myself am adept at finding the bugs and offering solutions, I don’t believe that I would inherently avoid causing similar bugs were I to code such an interactive app without AI assistance: QA brain is different from software engineering brain.
Медведев вышел в финал турнира в Дубае17:59
，更多细节参见旺商聊官方下载
Continue reading...
2月26日，瑞幸咖啡发布2025年第四季度及全年财报，营收规模再创新高。财报数据显示，公司全年总净收入同比增长43.0%至492.88亿元；净利润为36亿元，同比增长21.6%。
，推荐阅读WPS下载最新地址获取更多信息
view = result.value; // Must reassign
07:25, 28 февраля 2026Мир，推荐阅读91视频获取更多信息